Jicofo config #72

Closed
opened 2021-09-03 09:22:17 +00:00 by timowevel1 · 5 comments
timowevel1 commented 2021-09-03 09:22:17 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Hey,

I maybe found a little misconfiguration inside the jicofo.conf,

trusted-domains: recorder.domain
doesnt work for me. Jibri wont catch and audio/video streams.
I changed it to:
trusted-domains: [recorder.domain]
and it works fine.

Hey, I maybe found a little misconfiguration inside the jicofo.conf, trusted-domains: recorder.domain doesnt work for me. Jibri wont catch and audio/video streams. I changed it to: trusted-domains: [recorder.domain] and it works fine.
timowevel1 commented 2021-09-03 13:59:31 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Update, didnt fix it. Had the same issue on another installation. All ports are open, so there is no issue.

Update, didnt fix it. Had the same issue on another installation. All ports are open, so there is no issue.
Ark74 commented 2021-09-03 18:22:03 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I found this recently,
https://community.jitsi.org/t/alert-beware-of-chrome-92/103444

Could this be the case?

I'm still not sure how to confirm or deny this, one instance I've found this issue, but my personal one jibri is working fine with chrome 92-93 so far.
I don't host huge meetings, mostly 1-1, or up to 5 people, so couldn't say, also my main browser is a firefox based version so no chrome on the equation.
One client is reporting issues when recording, while 2 have confirmed it works, weird case.

I need to dig deeper, if I confirm, maybe I will host a fixed version of chrome and mark it on hold for the installer.
Wanna help to figure this out?

I found this recently, https://community.jitsi.org/t/alert-beware-of-chrome-92/103444 Could this be the case? I'm still not sure how to confirm or deny this, one instance I've found this issue, but my personal one jibri is working fine with chrome 92-93 so far. I don't host huge meetings, mostly 1-1, or up to 5 people, so couldn't say, also my main browser is a firefox based version so no chrome on the equation. One client is reporting issues when recording, while 2 have confirmed it works, weird case. I need to dig deeper, if I confirm, maybe I will host a fixed version of chrome and mark it on hold for the installer. Wanna help to figure this out?
timowevel1 commented 2021-09-03 18:28:58 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Hey, thanks for your answer.
I can confirm that for a few people/times I tried it it worked and a few times Jibri just didnt catch Audio/Video (you just see their avatars).
How can I help you?


From: Luis Guzman @.>
Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 8:22:13 PM
To: switnet-ltd/quick-jibri-installer @.
>
Cc: jasonjenssen @.>; Author @.>
Subject: Re: [switnet-ltd/quick-jibri-installer] Jicofo config (#72)

I found this recently,
https://community.jitsi.org/t/alert-beware-of-chrome-92/103444

Could this be the case?

I'm still not sure how to confirm or deny this, one instance I've found this issue, but my personal one jibri is working fine with chrome 92-93 so far.
I don't host huge meetings, mostly 1-1, or up to 5 people, so couldn't say, also my main browser is a firefox based version so no chrome on the equation.
One client is reporting issues when recording, while 2 have confirmed it works, weird case.

I need to dig deeper, if I confirm, maybe I will host a fixed version of chrome and mark it on hold for the installer.
Wanna help to figure this out?


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/switnet-ltd/quick-jibri-installer/issues/72#issuecomment-912725942, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGA5FL5GC5P7YJLWFIYDHRTUAEG5LANCNFSM5DLLCLOA.

Hey, thanks for your answer. I can confirm that for a few people/times I tried it it worked and a few times Jibri just didnt catch Audio/Video (you just see their avatars). How can I help you? ________________________________ From: Luis Guzman ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 8:22:13 PM To: switnet-ltd/quick-jibri-installer ***@***.***> Cc: jasonjenssen ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [switnet-ltd/quick-jibri-installer] Jicofo config (#72) I found this recently, https://community.jitsi.org/t/alert-beware-of-chrome-92/103444 Could this be the case? I'm still not sure how to confirm or deny this, one instance I've found this issue, but my personal one jibri is working fine with chrome 92-93 so far. I don't host huge meetings, mostly 1-1, or up to 5 people, so couldn't say, also my main browser is a firefox based version so no chrome on the equation. One client is reporting issues when recording, while 2 have confirmed it works, weird case. I need to dig deeper, if I confirm, maybe I will host a fixed version of chrome and mark it on hold for the installer. Wanna help to figure this out? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://github.com/switnet-ltd/quick-jibri-installer/issues/72#issuecomment-912725942>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGA5FL5GC5P7YJLWFIYDHRTUAEG5LANCNFSM5DLLCLOA>.
Ark74 commented 2021-09-03 18:34:48 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Maybe is something introduced on the latest release.

Maybe is something introduced on the latest release.
Ark74 commented 2021-09-06 10:03:54 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

From unstable,

The format seems to be,

    trusted-domains: [ "recorder.domain.com" ]

This is an issue from upstream, will be fixed in coming updates.

From unstable, The format seems to be, ``` trusted-domains: [ "recorder.domain.com" ] ``` This is an issue from upstream, will be fixed in coming updates.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: switnet/quick-jibri-installer#72
No description provided.